| Around 80% of children struggling with reading | | | | visual approach is substantially less effective to |
| between the ages of 6 and 9 display an "auditory | | | | read by than the auditory method is that the |
| deficit". There are several main reasons for | | | | average brain is incapable of memorising more |
| reading difficulty and dyslexia, but we have found | | | | than a few hundred words. Therefore reading |
| this to be by far the most significant one. A real | | | | anything more than simple text leads to a lot of |
| solution to the auditory deficit can massively | | | | holes in the flow of meaning. There is of course a |
| reduce the number of poor readers leaving | | | | range of ability in everything and some people |
| primary school. Currently around one in five | | | | with virtually photographic memories will be able |
| children reach 11 unable to read proficiently. So | | | | to memorise more words than that. And some |
| this is an issue for 600,000 children around the | | | | highly experienced readers (like lawyers and |
| world in each academic year and about 30 million | | | | academics) will combine both approaches by |
| adults who are functionally illiterate with an | | | | skimming a text visually at high speed and then |
| auditory deficit. The symptoms of an auditory | | | | zoning in on just the important parts using a |
| deficit are a lot of guessing when reading | | | | slower auditory process. But the effectiveness of |
| (particularly with short words), an inability to | | | | the skimming is dependent on their ability to read |
| decode a simple nonsense word like thrintock, | | | | any word as well. Unfortunately, the children who |
| mounbill or flognike and sometimes an ability to | | | | are reading visually seem to do well initially and |
| read text out loud without following the meaning. | | | | are unaware that they are heading in the wrong |
| So what is an auditory deficit and why is it a | | | | direction. |
| significant factor? First I need to explain the two | | | | In year 1 and perhaps year 2 of school everyone |
| potential processes to reading text. If you have | | | | is happy. But somewhere between the ages of 6 |
| the "little voice" in your head as you read this, | | | | and 9 they will move onto a reading plateau as |
| you are using an auditory process. On the other | | | | the text gets more complicated and the task just |
| hand, if you are recognizing words visually and | | | | seems to get harder and harder. You will often |
| guessing or skipping the ones you are not sure | | | | then see a lot of frustration and anxiety. This |
| about, then you are using a visual process. Let's | | | | normally translates into a strongly negative |
| look at the auditory process first. The image of | | | | emotion towards reading and substantial |
| the text lands on your retinas (at the back of | | | | resistance to further efforts. The whole thing can |
| your eyes) and the signal is passed to your visual | | | | get very upsetting for both child and parents. But |
| cortex. The visual cortex, at the back of your | | | | here is the important thing to understanding this. |
| head, analyzes it and recognizes the patterns of | | | | The fact that they have not engaged their |
| the letters. That information is then passed to | | | | auditory cortex has conventionally been blamed |
| your auditory cortex, in your left hemisphere | | | | on an unidentified "problem" with that part of their |
| close to your left ear, where the letter patterns | | | | brain. |
| are mapped to corresponding possible sounds. In | | | | We have found that to be profoundly wrong, |
| English there are 204 letter patterns that | | | | except in very rare cases. The children are |
| represent roughly 70 individual sounds. | | | | showing no problem with their auditory and |
| So they are not one-to-one relationships, but | | | | linguistic cortex if they can hear and speak |
| there is a code, nonetheless. The most likely | | | | language successfully. So why do we think it |
| sounds are then blended to form the word and | | | | suddenly malfunctions when used for reading? |
| that is passed to the linguistic cortex beside your | | | | The truth is that the visual to pre-frontal |
| left cheekbone. The linguistic cortex has two | | | | connection is a very strong one. We are using it |
| distinct areas to it. The posterior zone (nearest | | | | all the time. It is a "natural" process in the sense |
| your ear) is for comprehension of language and is | | | | that it has been developed over millions of years |
| called Wernicke's area. The anterior zone (nearest | | | | of evolution. By contrast, the visual to auditory |
| your left eyebrow) is called Broca's area and is | | | | connection is only used for reading. It is a |
| used for the production of language. Therefore it | | | | connection we have created in the last 5000 |
| is Wernicke's area that turns the blended word | | | | years and is therefore not "natural". |
| from the auditory cortex into meaning and passes | | | | Therefore it is not that the children can't engage |
| that to your pre-frontal cortex at the front of | | | | their auditory cortex in the reading process. It is |
| your brain. That is where you "think" about stuff | | | | just that they haven't . They have naturally gone |
| in a conscious manner. If you are reading out loud, | | | | down the other path. In order to fix the auditory |
| you then connect to Broca's area in order to | | | | deficit it is necessary to "re-engineer" the |
| generate speech, although it is possible to loop | | | | neurology of the reading process for the child, by |
| straight from Wernicke's area to Broca's area, | | | | rerouting it through the auditory cortex. But that |
| which leads to that rather monotone reading | | | | is absolutely possible and often gets very quick |
| style, absent of any intonation. In contrast to all | | | | results. With the right guidance we often find the |
| of that, the visual reader loops straight from the | | | | penny drops in a matter of weeks. Of course the |
| visual cortex to the pre-frontal cortex. The word | | | | longer a child has been developing a visual |
| cow , for instance, is processed in much the | | | | approach to text, the harder it is to switch. But |
| same way as a picture of a cow. The auditory | | | | that certainly does not make it impossible. The |
| cortex remains dormant. That is why it is called | | | | ages 6-9 are the ideal for fixing the situation, but |
| an auditory deficit. | | | | we have worked successfully with 70-year-olds |
| The absence of activity in the auditory cortex | | | | too! It is never too late. |
| can be seen on an MRI scan. The reason that this | | | | |